← The index · Language, art & other · by sukoji

flyboard

Music chart voted by a GPU simulation of MaleCNS v1.0 (~165k neurons) after 84 songs.

MaleCNS
Fidelity · reviewed
L1 Dynamics

Neurons are simulated — leaky integrate-and-fire or better — with documented, tuned parameters.

Dispute this rating →

The evidence

No evidence, no level.
Rating note

Every traced neuron of MaleCNS v1.0 (165,122 neurons, connections with 5+ synapses, signed by predicted neurotransmitter) is simulated as a leaky integrate-and-fire unit on GPU with parameters following Shiu et al. 2024 and one deliberate documented deviation (w_syn rescaled from 0.275 to 0.125 mV because MaleCNS neurons carry ~1.4x more synapses), and both the song scores and the command-mode body movements are read out of those simulated spikes. Not L2: the sparse weight matrix is built once in the Brain constructor and only ever appears inside torch.sparse.mm in the step loop - nothing is trained anywhere in the repo, not even a readout; the score is a cosine similarity against the response to a reference courtship song, which involves no fitting at all. No validation mark either, despite the unusually strong self-criticism: the ear-only ablation, the shuffled-session robustness checks and the command-neuron-to-motor-output table are internal consistency checks, not a published comparison against real fly measurements. The project's own honest reading - that this fly mostly hears the balance between its two ear channels, barely distinguishes a lover from a wasp, and that they switched from mean to median after seeing a motor circuit latch on - is the most useful thing on the page and should carry over into any summary.

Record

CategoryLanguage, art & other
DatasetsMaleCNS
LevelL1 — reviewed
Listed intownie/awesome-fruit-fly
First indexed2026-09-15
[viewersukoji.github.io/flyboard/

Ratings on thelearningfly.com are proposals, not verdicts. Every one of them is arguable in public.