NeuroTerrarium
Inspectable 3D lab with a synthetic terrarium and a separate 51-body MaleCNS giant-fiber microcircuit. Reports a negative topology-control result. Circuit subset.
Neurons are simulated — leaky integrate-and-fire or better — with documented, tuned parameters.
Dispute this rating →The evidence
No evidence, no level.The real MaleCNS microcircuit's edge weights are derived from measured contact counts and signed by transmitter, then run through the shared network backend.
https://github.com/5p00kyy/neuroterrarium/blob/bbf83f84304a72df57953474f4f93c99ad01930d/src/sim/circuit.ts#L160-L200The neuron model is a leak/threshold/reset/refractory integrate-and-fire; the step loop only reads graph.weights.
https://github.com/5p00kyy/neuroterrarium/blob/bbf83f84304a72df57953474f4f93c99ad01930d/src/sim/network.ts#L165-L199The only learning in the repo is a regularized gradient fit of a linear readout vector, separate from the recurrent graph.
https://github.com/5p00kyy/neuroterrarium/blob/bbf83f84304a72df57953474f4f93c99ad01930d/src/sim/learning.ts#L59-L104The project's own mode table lists trainable parameters as 49 readout coefficients and states that perturbations never edit recurrent edges.
https://github.com/5p00kyy/neuroterrarium/blob/bbf83f84304a72df57953474f4f93c99ad01930d/README.md#L67-L82
The embodied terrarium the user first sees is a 48-neuron synthetic fixture with hardcoded weights and no connectome in it at all. What keeps this project on the scale is the separate Phase 3 instrument: a real MaleCNS 51-body giant-fibre input microcircuit, bundled with its source queries and checksums, converted to signed weights from measured contact counts and stepped through the same leak/threshold/refractory LIF for a bounded pulse experiment against matched controls and ablations. That is L1 - real wiring, real membrane dynamics. Not L2: the only fitted parameters anywhere are 49 linear readout coefficients trained by gradient descent in learning.ts, on the synthetic fixture rather than the connectome, and the app's own mode table says perturbations never edit recurrent edges. The project also publishes its own negative result - the biological microcircuit and all five rewired controls respond identically to the default pulse - and that honesty should carry into the index rather than count against it.
Record
Nearby
All projects →Ratings on thelearningfly.com are proposals, not verdicts. Every one of them is arguable in public.